|


Home
About us
Subscribe
Archive Links Contact
SPRING
2005
Vol 39 No 3
Editorial
ENGAGING WITH CHANGE
Richard
Lennan
STILL RELEVANT? Vatican II Forty Years On
Tony
Paganoni CS
ETHNIC MINISTRY IN AUSTRALIA: History, Present Realities and Future Options
Frank
Fletcher MSC
THE SPIRITUALITY OF THE HEART: The EJ Cuskelly Memorial Lecture 2005
Brian
San
GOD SHOUTS TO US IN OUR PAIN
Rev
Dr Lawrence Cross, Australian Catholic University
TOPICAL COMMENT - TERRORISTS, MARTYRS AND SUICIDES: Consulting the Early
Church
John
Falzon
STATS AND STONES: Vinnies’ report from the trenches on the poverty wars
Danny
Kinnane
MERTON: A Modern Perspective
Janiene
Wilson
REVIEW: Jane Anderson, Priests in Love: Australian Catholic Clergy and
Their Intimate Friendships.
Kevin
Mark
NEW RELIGIOUS BOOKS BY AUSTRALASIAN AUTHORS
|
The
Spirituality of the Heart:
The EJ Cuskelly Memorial Lecture 2005
FRANK FLETCHER MSC
THERE IS A stanza of a poem by e.e.cummings which I like. Whatever cummings
may have meant by it, I believe the words articulate the kind of passion
behind the spirituality of the heart:
here is the deepest secret nobody knows
(here is the root of the root and the bud of the bud
and the sky of the sky of a tree called life, which grows
higher than soul can hope or mind can hide)
and this is the wonder that's keeping the stars apart
I carry your heart (I carry it in my heart)
—e.e.cummings
This poem reminds me of the MSC founder, Father Jules Chevalier. Photos
and paintings consistently portray him with an image of the heart of Jesus
worn next to his human heart: a way of hearts together.
There is also a scripture verse which resonates for me especially in connection
with this spirituality: 'We have entrusted ourselves to the Love of God
for us' (1 John 4:16). That verse was the favourite verse of Bishop Jim
Cuskelly in his teaching on heart spirituality. However he used the translation
'We have believed in the love of God for us'.
Bishop Cuskelly was a man of rare spiritual perception. Through his reputation
in this regard and through his writings he was elected the international
Superior of the Missionaries of the Sacred Heart. After his twelve years
in that appointment he was invited by the Archbishop of Brisbane to be
an auxiliary bishop in that diocese.
As leader of the congregation the archives of the MSC were open to him
and he brought his mind to bear on the life and writings of the MSC founder,
Jules Chevalier. He went on to put Chevalier's spirituality into approaches
more appealing for our time. He laid stress particularly on people's desire
for God. He recognised such desire as common among all levels of the Church:
laity, religious and clergy. His last book was dedicated to lay people.
There are two words used by Chevalier and Cuskelly upon which I would
like to build. The first word is desire: the second word is everywhere.
Putting these together: the desire for God's love stirs in the hearts
of people everywhere. Through belief in this hidden stirring, the sons
and daughters of Chevalier have understood that their mission is to awaken
people everywhere to the desire within them. Further, although this spirituality
begins as a stirring hidden in peoples' hearts, yet among those who are
awakened there arises a desire to belong in a movement…and when people
belong to one another in a heart movement, their desire for Jesus can
become boundless. Chevalier himself expressed this boundless desire in
the MSC motto: May the heart of Jesus be loved everywhere!
Let me build further on the everywhere. It means not only in every place
but among all kinds of people, some of whom we might be tempted to dismiss
as quite unlikely. One such group occurred to my mind recently. In the
ABC TV show Enough Rope, 11th April 2005, Sir Bob Geldof was interviewed.
Geldof is a pop star world famous for inspiring the Live Aid concerts
for Africa. In that interview Geldof made the comment that, for many of
the younger adult generations, rock and dance concerts express a search
for religion. He had seen this, he said, across cultures and peoples.
At first I was annoyed hearing this. I recalled how the Beatles' leader,
John Lennon, once claimed they were more popular than Jesus Christ. It
was a frivolous comment, I should not have taken it seriously. So, as
I prepared for bed I began to think positively on what Geldof might have
meant. Did he mean that beneath the loud music of the concerts, many of
the younger adult generations are craving for faith and for human solidarity?
Certainly their language suggests solidarity in so far as they speak of
an inclusivity: 'others' are not to be excluded. So let us take solidarity
as one underlying desire. And to the desire for solidarity add ecstasy
(I am not indicating the drug). What I mean is ecstatic experience: ecstatic
means carried beyond one's ordinary self. Through the beat of the music
and the primal release of stress they feel liberated from the pressures
and emptiness of modern living. Could that ecstatic experience be somewhat
akin to the ecstatic love spoken of by classic spiritual writers such
as St Francis de Sales?
Of course you may take me as naďve. Am I overlooking the use of drugs
by some performers and by some of the crowd? Well, maybe I am. However,
is it right to so emphasise what is evil that we overlook the underlying
desires for true belonging and loving, desires which are affecting whole
generations. Heart spirituality feeds upon the Gospels. It is influenced
strongly by Jesus' merciful attitude toward the tax collectors and prostitutes.
He found them closer to the Kingdom of God than their self-righteous accusers.
Again, stressing the positive, there is an emphasis on ecstatic love in
the songs of the concerts. It seems younger people share an intuition
that the underlying movement within life is the coming of the fullness
of love, a love which will bring life to its ultimate meaning and justice.
Love must conquer evil. Therefore, in the rock and dance concerts, the
singers and musicians take on the appearance of love figures. Are such
figures altogether contrary to Christian love? Some are. But remember:
the Christian tradition carries genuine experience of ecstatic love. Recall
the First Letter of Peter: 'Although you have not seen [Christ] yet you
love Him, and even though you do not see him now you believe in him and
you rejoice with indomitable joy' (1 Peter 1:9-10). This means a high
level of love in the heart: a long distance from drugs, but deeply satisfying.
The First Path
Let me put forward now four distinct paths to Heart Spirituality. The
first path is a way of trust. It recalls Jim Cuskelly's favourite text
in the First Letter of John : 'We have entrusted ourselves to the love
of God for us' (1 John 4:16). If this trust in God's love 'touches' us,
there arises a desire to give oneself over to His love. This giving-over
means a desire to accept life including its dark places. It is a belief
that Jesus is in all the shocks and crevices of life–and that He will
watch over us from His Heart…This trust is the beginning. At some point
we move to a second place. Our desire to give ourselves in trust is overtaken
by His desire. Our giving is met by His giving. He gives His Heart in
exchange for ours. So the way of trust blossoms into the exchange of hearts.
A feature of this way of exchange is that people may express it in ceremonies.
It puts symbols and words on the desire to entrust our life, death, everything
to Jesus' love. That entrusting is a big grace… to be encouraged with
much prayer…Then somewhere along the way the Master opens His Heart to
us… He dwells in us, we in Him: the exchange of hearts.
The Second Path
If this exchange of hearts is authentic it will be followed by an exchange
of life. Why is life transformed by exchange of hearts? Obviously when
one is in love one wants to let the beloved into one's life. St Paul the
Apostle wrote: 'I live now but it is not I who live– Christ lives in me'
(Gal 2:20-21). Christ Jesus, like any lover, delights to live in our lives:
and he wants us to live in his love. The heart is not a talent to be buried
in the ground and returned to the master un-used. Our hearts are made
for exchange.
However, within us there is also a refusal to change, a refusal to love.
And just as there is a field of love exchange, so also there is a field
of love refusal. And large sections of the world are dominated by the
refusal of love. Remember how Jesus was tempted by the great refuser who
boasted of his power over the world. John's Gospel chapter one speaks
of Jesus as the true light who gives light to every human being. Christ
was everywhere in the world but the world would not recognise him. The
light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not overcome it.
That struggle between the refusal of love and the willing exchange of
love is the root conflict we are all caught up in. The conflict between
the desire for heart exchange and the refusal of it can be obvious in
a couple entering marriage. The ceremony contains an exchange of vows
followed by an exchange of rings. As we pray for them we know that in
the years of marriage the couple will either give their love to one another
as part of the divine-human exchange, or they will refuse it in key areas
of their lives. If the latter they will need to break through to deeper
levels of heart.
As the exchange struggle in marriage illustrates, the exchange of human
hearts opens the couple up to an exchange with the divine love in Jesus
Christ. This exchange struggle is at the core of Jules Chevalier's spirituality.
I have checked through a number of quotes from Chevalier. He encouraged
people at every level to withstand the refusal of love and to enter into
the divine-human exchange. In that exchange people will break through
to the great love assertions in John's Gospel. God is love. Whoever lives
in love lives in God (1Jn 4:16). This breakthrough was manifest in the
life of the medieval poet Dante. On a street in Florence Dante beheld
a young woman named Beatrice. Immediately he knew she was the woman his
heart loved. What followed was more wonderful. Dante declared that in
his experience of falling in love, Dante knew there is a Christ, knew
there is a Saviour. In the love experience he felt the truth: God is love.
God acts as one who loves. When one is in love, there is not only a recognition
of the beloved; one also glimpses the whole plan of love, no matter how
bleak the world can seem. Hope arises in the heart: there is a divine
solution to the problem of evil: a solution given in the passionate heart
of Jesus.
Much more could be said of the first and second approaches to heart spirituality:
the trust which leads to an exchange of heart. An exchange which is an
encouragement for living with our weaknesses. Paul the apostle attributed
his perseverance to this exchange of heart with Christ. 'Gladly will I
glory in my weaknesses' he wrote, 'so that the power of Christ may dwell
within me.' (2 Cor 12:9b) Further, going back to the rock concert discussion,
the desire which invites people towards the exchange of hearts has some
connection with the desires which possess the younger adult generation,
namely the desires for ecstatic love and solidarity.
The Third Path
Now, let me move to a third path into heart spirituality, a way attractive
to the compassion of many today. A contemporary exponent of this approach
is Jean Vanier, founder of the L'Arche communities for people mentally
disadvantaged. From his association with these people whom the world tends
to look down on, Vanier writes:
The heart is the basic level of expression, a truth best discovered
when we have been stripped of all power, competence and hope. It is here
our elderly and handicapped people of L'Arche seem to specialise in a
deep and loving relationship with God and with other people…they are helping
us to discover our own long lost heart'. (John Ayres, 'Rediscovering the
heart of faith', Compass 1998:4, p.15.)
Vanier's words connect with the solidarity which is part of the young
adult desires. In this solidarity people experience a humble depth in
themselves; it is the heart which can overcome that self-centredness which
despises less fortunate people.
Again, there is much that should be said of this awakening of the heart
through being attentive to marginalised people. This inclusivity, as we
have already noted, is a mark of many groups of young adults and others.
The growth of L'Arche communities (and of other groups such as the St
Francis houses and the Cana communities in Sydney) is a powerful witness.
This path with the less fortunate stirs a genuinely humble and compassionate
heart.
The Fourth Path
Now let me move to the final path into heart spirituality, a way connected
with the spirituality of Aboriginal people, a spirituality of the divine
mystery manifest in nature.
To set the scene for this fourth path let me refer to some of the writing
of the eminent Australian anthropologist professor WEH Stanner. Stanner
spent some time among the Aboriginal tribes of Wadeye (Port Keats) NT,
a place of long-time ministering by MSC and the OLSH sisters among the
Aboriginal people. Stanner studied the traditional Aboriginal languages
of the area. In this study he made clear that in their traditional languages
a being is not just a thing. Rather every being bears a mystic inwardness,
a spirituality. Stanner's work suggests that we moderns have lost awareness
of the spirituality which envelops us. Yet I believe we can recover something
of this awareness—particularly if we are attentive to the word heart.
Even in our modern language it has a mysterious quality. Let me give an
example.
Cathy Freeman declared that her decision to resign from world competitive
athletics came from her heart. Do we know what she meant by 'came from
her heart'? We say, yes. But if we are pushed to say precisely how the
decision came from her heart we may be struggling. That is the paradox
of the word heart: we feel we know but at the same time its meaning is
obscure. To register the unusual character of the word heart some scholars
have called it a primordial word. It is a strange word, this primordial
word. We get near what primordial means if we approach it as mystical
and poetic. Primordial words are poetic in so far as they voice the depths
of existence whilst not presuming to sort them out. Heart points towards
the mystery of who one is; but it holds back from a definition lest it
lose the deeper meanings it can evoke.
The Aboriginal person who has proposed her heart experience as a spirituality
is Miriam Rose Ungunmer Baumann of the Daly River N.T. In her language
the word for heart is Dadirri which means literally 'deep inner springs',
a more imaginative expression than ours.
For her Dadirri prayer Miriam suggests people go into the bush, sit there
quietly and wait for the deep-inner-springs to 'move' within them. Miriam
expects that after some time mystical words will arise, such as Jesus
and Saviour. They are signs of the Beloved, the One our hearts love: a
touch of ecstasy.
Sitting quietly in the bush makes more sense when we recall the Aboriginal
perception of inwardness and mystery within all beings. Beings are not
just things. The whole world is full of mystery. At its centre there is
the presence of the Saviour. Sometimes we feel a pull upon our hearts
to join the circle of His love.
The Heart Movement
Now let me move to the movement which takes in all four paths. It is the
heart movement which was the dream of Father Jules Chevalier to renew
all levels of the Church. To understand Chevalier's dream we must grasp
something of his historical context.
Chevalier grew up in the anti-church atmosphere which followed upon the
French Revolution. Those who came to power enthroned secular reason and
modernity's love affair with the machine. Reason and the machine stood
for progress; religion was a childish clinging to the mindset of the old
regime. Many people dropped away from faith. And to compound the church's
problems sectors of the clergy were under the influence of the Jansenist
heresy. Jansenists had some positive characteristics but they preached
a God whose holiness was judgmental, whose face severe. Chevalier and
some fellow seminarians were upset by the decline of the church. They
prayed for guidance. Enlightenment came for them when a theology lecturer
introduced them to the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. 'It went
straight to my heart', Chevalier wrote. Further, it was not that he was
drawn to love Jesus but rather that the Heart of Jesus longed to remedy
the crises of church and culture. Jesus offered His Heart as the way—and
Chevalier responded. He endlessly recommended to contemplation the passionate
love of God in the Heart of Jesus. The 'touch' of this love was Chevalier's
starting point for everything: it shaped his spirituality, his pastoral
ministry, his invincible hope for a renewal of the church.
For many years I found his vision too deep for my mind and heart. Finally
an enlightenment came to me from reading an anthropological book by Deborah
Rose. She was attempting to distil a sense of the Aboriginal Dreaming.
She did not put together a description of the Dreaming from the Aboriginal
words in the ceremonies; rather she described what she felt when listening
to the Aborigines. Thus she grasped a sense of the Dreaming as like a
rolling ocean beating up against a thin strand of sandy beach on which
we stand. In other words, we are on the edge of fathomless mystery.
I feel a similar sense of 'ocean' in Chevalier's vision—except that, for
Chevalier the ocean represents that divine passion which seeks our fragmentary
hearts. The ocean also represents the divine compassion. From these convictions
came Chevalier's stand against the Jansenist images of severity. In an
early effort at drawing up MSC Constitutions (1877) Jules wrote: 'We must
take a stand against the destructive spirit of fear and severity which
has wrought so much havoc in the Church'. What upset Chevalier so much
was that this severity pictured God as a judge aloof from his people,
angry at their unworthiness as if they must earn divine love. This was
anathema to what Chevalier understood from the Heart of Jesus in John's
Gospel. The passionate lover gives himself freely, cares for us as friends,
loves us as the Father loves Him. The Father and the Son delight to come
into our hearts.
Linked with the divine compassion Chevalier felt the tenderness of Christ,
he wrote: 'Jesus was happy to pour out the tenderness of his heart on
the little ones and on the poor, on those who suffer and on sinners, on
all the miseries of humanity. The sight of any misfortune moved His heart
with compassion' (MSC Constitutions, n.6).
Let me conclude with the perception on which I have built throughout this
essay: human hearts desire the touch of ecstatic love. To which we added
'everywhere'. Everywhere became the thrust of the missionary movement.
The desire for love stirs among all people even if sometimes deeply hidden—and
rock concerts are not a deep hiding place! Young adults openly long for
ecstatic love.
From the hidden stream of people longing for that love Chevalier put together
a heart movement of laity, religious and clergy who have felt a stirring
of their hearts. At this present time, we MSC, our sister congregations
and numbers of lay catholics are recapturing Chevalier's vision of the
Heart movement.
To conclude. My prayer is that the Holy Spirit may awaken in our hearts
to trust in the love of God in the Heart of Jesus. Recall again Cuskelly's
favourite text: 'We have entrusted ourselves to God's love for us'.
Further, let us respect the ecstatic desires of younger generations. Of
them the theologian Fr Timothy Radcliffe has written: they have belief
but not belonging. They would belong if they were touched by the depth
of Jesus' kindness…In that connection I recall the e.e.cummings stanza:
here is the deepest secret nobody knows
(here is the root of the root and the bud of the bud
and the sky of the sky of a tree called life, which grows
higher than soul can hope or mind can hide)
and this is the wonder that's keeping the stars apart
I carry your heart (I carry it in my heart)
Chevalier was right to wear the Heart of Jesus on his heart.
Fr Frank Fletcher MSC has
lectured in theology and spirituality in Australia and Canada. For sixteen
years he has ministered to Aboriginal people in Sydney.
2005 was the Centenary Year of the Missionaries of the Sacred Heart in
Australia.
|